HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agrawal, S
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agrawal, S
Right arrow Articles by Reid, D S
Heart 1999;82:378-382 ( September )

Technician run open access exercise electrocardiography

S Agrawala, S S Danbauchia, J Goodfellowb, S A Robsonc, D S Reida

a Department of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK, b Department of Clinical Audit, Freeman Hospital, c Department of Exercise ECG, Freeman Hospital

Correspondence to: Dr Reid.

Accepted for publication 19 March 1999

OBJECTIVE---To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of the technician run open access exercise electrocardiography service at Freeman Hospital.
DESIGN---Questionnaire analysis of the responses of the general practitioners of randomly selected patients who used the service.
SETTING---A tertiary care cardiac centre, providing an open access service to general practitioners in the community.
PATIENTS---269 patients randomly selected from 552 who underwent open access exercise electrocardiography over a 2.5 year period.
OUTCOME MEASURES---Utilisation of service: the reasons for referral, whether the service was optimally used by the general practitioners, and its effect on their management practice; effect on number of cardiology referrals; benefit to the patients; safety, efficacy, and feasibility of a technician run service; general practitioners' assessment of the service.
RESULTS---147 of 178 general practitioners (82.6%) responded to the questionnaire, on 247 of 269 patients (91.8%). General practitioners used the service for diagnosing ischaemic heart disease in 72.5% of cases, for prognostic purposes in 17.8%, or both in 5.3%. In 197 cases (79.8%), the general practitioners felt that the service had changed the way they managed their patients. The exercise test was positive in 90 patients (36.5%) and identified 38 as at high risk. The service was effective in optimising the cardiology service by reducing referrals by 47%.
CONCLUSIONS---The service was used by general practitioners primarily for diagnosing ischaemic heart disease and not so often for prognosis. The utilisation of the service was optimal as assessed by the high positivity rate. The service meets its primary objective of assisting general practitioners in the management of patients with suspected ischaemic heart disease, and may have helped to optimise resources by reducing the number of referrals to cardiologists. It has helped prioritise patient management and may have benefited high risk patients by facilitating rapid identification and referral. It can be run safely and effectively by trained technicians.


Keywords: exercise stress testing; open access services; cardiac technician; audit


© 1999 by Heart



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
N. GALL
Technician run open access exercise electrocardiography
Heart, June 1, 2000; 83(6): 713b - 713.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 1999 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd & British Cardiovascular Society