|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
a Manchester Heart
Centre, The Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK, b Department of Instrumentation and Analytical
Science, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology,
Manchester, UK, c Department of Anaesthetics, The Royal Infirmary,
Manchester
Correspondence to: Dr Fitzpatrick email: adam.fitzpatrick{at}man.ac.uk
Accepted 23
September 1999
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the haemodynamic effects of
varying the angle of head up tilt.
METHODS
20 healthy subjects (12 female, eight male; mean
(SD) age 33.6 (8.4) years) underwent head up tilt for five minutes to
each of four angles of tilt in random order, with a five minute rest period at the horizontal between each angle. Forearm blood flow was
measured using intermittent occlusion mercury strain gauge plethysmography at two and five minutes. Subjects underwent continuous monitoring of heart rate, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) by Finapres and cardiac output and stroke volume
by impedance cardiography. Each variable was measured at two and five
minutes, averaged over the period of blood flow measurement.
RESULTS
Every haemodynamic variable at each angle was
significantly different from supine values. Head up tilt produced
progressive increases in heart rate (11-21%), SBP (12-21%), and DBP
(20-33%) with increasing tilt angle. However, although 45° produced
significantly less haemodynamic effect, there were no significant
differences for angles between 60° and 90°. Cardiac output fell on
head up tilt by 17-20% and stroke volume by 28-34%, but increasing
tilt angle produced no significant additional reduction in cardiac output and stroke volume because of increases in heart rate and vasoconstriction.
CONCLUSIONS
Angles < 60° produce significantly less
haemodynamic effects than steeper angles. Increasing tilt angle beyond
60° produces no apparent additional effect on cardiac output or
sympathetic tone. Increasing tilt angle beyond 60° confers no
additional orthostatic stress and may not affect the sensitivity and
specificity of head up tilt testing as previously thought. Sixty
degrees of tilt is a more practical angle for support of a syncopal
patient and is recommended.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Krabbendam, L. C. A. Jacobs, F. K. Lotgering, and M. E. A. Spaanderman Venous response to orthostatic stress Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): H1587 - H1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Krabbendam, B. J. Janssen, A. P. J. Van Dijk, H. W. Jongsma, W. J. G. Oyen, F. K. Lotgering, and M. E. A. Spaanderman The Relation Between Venous Reserve Capacity and Low Plasma Volume Reproductive Sciences, July 1, 2008; 15(6): 604 - 612. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. P. Fitzpatrick and A. Zaidi Tilt methodology in reflex syncope: emerging evidence J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2000; 36(1): 179 - 180. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bartoletti, P. Alboni, F. Ammirati, M. Brignole, A. Del Rosso, G. Foglia Manzillo, C. Menozzi, A. Raviele, and R. Sutton 'The Italian Protocol': a simplified head-up tilt testing potentiated with oral nitroglycerin to assess patients with unexplained syncope Europace, January 1, 2000; 2(4): 339 - 342. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |