|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Academic Department
of Cardiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
Correspondence to: Mr Aitchison j.d.aitchison{at}ncl.ac.uk
Accepted 16 August
2000
OBJECTIVE
To show whether increased
QT dispersion on admission predicts ventricular fibrillation after
acute myocardial infarction, and to determine the nature of time
related changes in QT dispersion.
DESIGN
Prospective cohort study.
SETTING
Coronary care units of three
teaching hospitals in Newcastle-upon-Tyne over an eight month period.
PATIENTS
All had acute myocardial
infarction according to World Health Organization criteria.
INTERVENTIONS
For all patients, QT
dispersion (QTd) and Bazett rate corrected QTc dispersion (QTcd) were
measured from a high quality 12 lead ECG recorded on admission at a
paper speed of 50 mm/s. In a subset, serial ECGs were recorded
regularly to show time related changes in QTcd following acute
myocardial infarction.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Occurrence of
ventricular fibrillation within the first 24 hours after myocardial infarction.
RESULTS
Data collected from 201 patients, 12 of whom (6%) developed ventricular fibrillation within 24 hours. Neither QTd nor QTcd differed between those developing
ventricular fibrillation and those who did not: QTd mean (SD), 74 (24) ms (95% confidence interval (CI) 59 to 89)
v 66 (24) ms (95% CI 62 to 70),
respectively; QTcd, 86 (26) ms0.5 (95% CI 70 to 102)
v 77 (29) ms0.5 (95% CI 72 to
82), respectively. Significant QTcd changes occurred early after
myocardial infarction.
CONCLUSIONS
Admission QTd and QTcd do
not predict ventricular fibrillation after acute myocardial infarction.
There are significant changes in QTcd with time, which may account for
this measured lack of correlation.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |