|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Wessex Regional
Cardiac Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton,
Hampshire SO16 6YD, UK
Correspondence to: Dr Simpson iain.simpson{at}suht.swest.nhs.uk
Accepted 8 November
2000
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate differences in
investigation results and treatment between men and women referred for
diagnostic treadmill exercise testing and coronary arteriography.
DESIGN
Cohort study.
SETTING
Tertiary cardiology centre.
SUBJECTS
1522 subjects referred by
primary care physicians to an open access chest pain clinic for initial
investigation of chest pain, of whom 485 were subsequently referred for
coronary arteriography; and a similar cohort of 107 subjects referred
directly by secondary care physicians for diagnostic coronary arteriography.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Rates of
positive exercise tests and rates for referral for arteriography and
revascularisation according to sex.
RESULTS
Overall, women were less
likely to be referred for arteriography and revascularisation than men.
However, men were more likely to have positive exercise tests, and for
various exercise test diagnostic end points men were also more likely
to have significant coronary artery disease. After taking this into
account, there was no sex difference in referral rates for
arteriography or revascularisation.
CONCLUSIONS
There was no evidence of
a sex bias resulting in inappropriate underinvestigation or
undertreatment of women. However, the positive predictive value of
treadmill exercise testing is low for women and further research is
needed into how best to investigate women with chest pain.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Pilote, K. Dasgupta, V. Guru, K. H. Humphries, J. McGrath, C. Norris, D. Rabi, J. Tremblay, A. Alamian, T. Barnett, et al. A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 13, 2007; 176(6): S1 - S44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A D Kelion, C Anagnostopoulos, M Harbinson, S R Underwood, M Metcalfe, and for the British Nuclear Cardiology Society Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in the UK: insights from the British Nuclear Cardiology Society Survey 2000 Heart, September 1, 2005; 91(suppl_4): iv2 - iv5. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Prepared jointly by the British Cardiac Society, t Setting up a myocardial perfusion scintigraphy service: clinical and business aspects Heart, September 1, 2005; 91(suppl_4): iv6 - iv14. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Daly, F. Clemens, J. L. L. Sendon, L. Tavazzi, E. Boersma, N. Danchin, F. Delahaye, A. Gitt, D. Julian, D. Mulcahy, et al. The clinical characteristics and investigations planned in patients with stable angina presenting to cardiologists in Europe: from the Euro Heart Survey of Stable Angina Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2005; 26(10): 996 - 1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S R Underwood and L J Shaw Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and cost effectiveness of diagnosis and management of coronary heart disease Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(suppl_5): v34 - v36. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S L Rahman and A D Kelion Nuclear cardiology in the UK: do we apply evidence based medicine? Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(suppl_5): v37 - v40. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Barrett-Connor, E.-G. V. Giardina, A. K. Gitt, U. Gudat, H. O. Steinberg, and D. Tschoepe Women and Heart Disease: The Role of Diabetes and Hyperglycemia Arch Intern Med, May 10, 2004; 164(9): 934 - 942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y K Wong, S Dawkins, R Grimes, F Smith, K D Dawkins, and I A Simpson Improving the positive predictive value of exercise testing in women Heart, December 1, 2003; 89(12): 1416 - 1421. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D V. Anand, D. Lipkin, and A. Lahiri Finding the age of the patient's heart BMJ, May 15, 2003; 326(7398): 1045 - 1046. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R M Martin, H Hemingway, D Gunnell, K R Karsch, A Baumbach, and S Frankel Population need for coronary revascularisation: are national targets for England credible? Heart, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 627 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
Read all eLetters
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |