|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
a Centre for Ageing
Population Studies, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences,
Royal Free and University College Medical School, Royal Free Campus,
Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK, b Department of Cardiology, John Radcliffe
Hospital, Oxford, UK, c Department of Health Care for the Elderly,
Pinderfields Hospital, Wakefield, UK, d Department
of Health Care for the Elderly, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh,
UK, e Department of Health Care for
the Elderly, Princess Royal Hospital, Haywards Heath, Sussex, UK
Correspondence to: Professor Bowling rfpc0034{at}rfhsm.ac.uk
Accepted 13 February
2001
OBJECTIVES
To assess whether patients
with heart disease in a single UK hospital have equitable access to
exercise testing, coronary angiography, and coronary artery bypass
graft surgery (CABG).
METHOD
Retrospective analysis of
patients' medical case notes (n = 1790), tracking each case back 12 months and forward 12 months from the patient's date of entry to the study.
SETTING
Single UK district hospital
in the Thames Region.
PATIENTS
Patients (elective and emergency) with a cardiac
ICD inpatient code at discharge or death, or who were referred to
cardiology or care of the elderly unit over a 12 month period in
1996-7 (new episodes) were included.
RESULTS
Analysis of 1790 hospital
case notes revealed that, despite having indications for intervention
identical to those of younger patients, older patients (that is, those
aged > 75 years) and women, independently, were significantly less
likely to undergo exercise tolerance testing (exercise ECG) and cardiac
catheterisation. The similar trends for age and access to CABG did not
achieve significance. While clinical priority scores also independently predicted access to cardiac catheterisation and CABG, considerable numbers of patients in high clinical priority groups were not referred
for either procedure.
CONCLUSIONS
The management and
treatment of older patients and women with cardiac disease may be
different from that of younger patients and men. Given the similarity
of the indications for treatment and the lack of significant
contraindications or comorbidities as a cause for these differences,
one possible explanation is that these patients are being discriminated
against principally because of their age and sex. Although clinical
priority scores independently predicted access to catheterisation and
CABG, large proportions of patients in high priority groups were not
referred. This implies that the New Zealand priority scoring system may be more equitable than UK practice. The cost implications of redressing these inequities in service provision would be considerable.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Bowling, B. Reeves, and G. Rowe Patient preferences for treatment for angina: an overview of findings from three studies J Health Serv Res Policy, October 1, 2008; 13(suppl_3): 104 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sekhri, A. Timmis, R. Chen, C. Junghans, N. Walsh, J. Zaman, S. Eldridge, H. Hemingway, and G. Feder Inequity of access to investigation and effect on clinical outcomes: prognostic study of coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris BMJ, May 10, 2008; 336(7652): 1058 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Nicholls, K. Wolski, I. Sipahi, P. Schoenhagen, T. Crowe, S. R. Kapadia, S. L. Hazen, E. M. Tuzcu, and S. E. Nissen Rate of Progression of Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque in Women J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 10, 2007; 49(14): 1546 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Harries, D. Forrest, N. Harvey, A. McClelland, and A. Bowling Which doctors are influenced by a patient's age? A multi-method study of angina treatment in general practice, cardiology and gerontology Qual. Saf. Health Care, February 1, 2007; 16(1): 23 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bowling, C. Harries, D. Forrest, and N. Harvey Variations in cardiac interventions: doctors' practices and views Fam. Pract., August 1, 2006; 23(4): 427 - 436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Shaw, C. N. Bairey Merz, C. J. Pepine, S. E. Reis, V. Bittner, S. F. Kelsey, M. Olson, B. D. Johnson, S. Mankad, B. L. Sharaf, et al. Insights From the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part I: Gender Differences in Traditional and Novel Risk Factors, Symptom Evaluation, and Gender-Optimized Diagnostic Strategies J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3_Suppl_S): S4 - S20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. N. Bairey Merz, L. J. Shaw, S. E. Reis, V. Bittner, S. F. Kelsey, M. Olson, B. D. Johnson, C. J. Pepine, S. Mankad, B. L. Sharaf, et al. Insights From the NHLBI-Sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study: Part II: Gender Differences in Presentation, Diagnosis, and Outcome With Regard to Gender-Based Pathophysiology of Atherosclerosis and Macrovascular and Microvascular Coronary Disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 7, 2006; 47(3_Suppl_S): S21 - S29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Wilson, M. Roland, and C. Ham The contribution of general practice and the general practitioner to NHS patients J R Soc Med, January 1, 2006; 99(1): 24 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Marshall and T. Wilson Competition in general practice BMJ, November 19, 2005; 331(7526): 1196 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R W Morris, P H Whincup, O Papacosta, M Walker, and A Thomson Inequalities in coronary revascularisation during the 1990s: evidence from the British regional heart study Heart, May 1, 2005; 91(5): 635 - 640. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Mieres, L. J. Shaw, A. Arai, M. J. Budoff, S. D. Flamm, W. G. Hundley, T. H. Marwick, L. Mosca, A. R. Patel, M. A. Quinones, et al. Role of Noninvasive Testing in the Clinical Evaluation of Women With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus Statement From the Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention Committee, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, American Heart Association Circulation, February 8, 2005; 111(5): 682 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F Fox Investigation and management of chest pain Heart, January 1, 2005; 91(1): 105 - 110. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. F. Jerant, P. Franks, J. E. Jackson, and M. P. Doescher Age-Related Disparities in Cancer Screening: Analysis of 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 481 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Quaas, N Curzen, and C Garratt Non-clinical factors influencing the selection of patients with acute coronary syndromes for angiography Postgrad. Med. J., July 1, 2004; 80(945): 411 - 414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Bowling Socioeconomic differentials in mortality among older people J Epidemiol Community Health, June 1, 2004; 58(6): 438 - 440. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Kennelly and A Bowling Suffering in deference: a focus group study of older cardiac patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2001; 10(90001): i23 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |